'tPɉ^B cѵB<\]\aP55}xhK] )Y/5wyڰdkz?XZz +PoVFUKD_N,ʨ*;:[h8R8`?̗'s.AH^|ߦ4ȩnQ|׹(㏭d&[*7PӚup9m/q%ӮPeՂȎ{杭~aVmŢg,`L\QxdrHTx[Ȩcb@ ^1/k1leW4nq"^rCӋLH=>B6 ,[zQf/*3Ҋ򎁨[n6z !txI7ڲο&D=B]WN֡kkA'}@?D/@R> IXZ2A>dfKTxlMMzgI&7t@;c$[@x^$䆯U>MhN}(Ol̰rKn `or [:/2' uC#_T&zL9"h<{b A0妸5enNTɪ)8!2C]^!KNw[kVdz m[qfHXg7ժOG*z+$URg9"{Y2":KT چJa*NJ mCK/A@)H$=CLXy钢KqbT ; ۄI>:/uSZCy;3ސ.@bޣ%{mUdD- ŏʙGfvn qNigdo~p;!GDA3OyjFZl/@W.)6}3г=ҶPH}>\IBj&Tˀ0Uc@Kپ@$NKvp)9rTZD$)5Uuc犿L{''eJAEzpլNlz[c<"i,D(?CoB7<,\!shΐrDR_,X׷%"^0uyݳ_%Up8ZR`ion2Oo.t.pthƁVw#9\#7.̇ t;ց>U]LYZwLT{/z&^0ē1oa"Y8ЙL cdg׍gK96a}@L#>("@`myGUxK}dF3EǮZU|J~{۪sN@7`I`\ORȎ WA:4/bϷ+gjM .РgұEA% ǒ}Ta&0u=G:in3[{jufSQ=U2[qUxn"gyJGjKʽuH6wݢ@)ˈ)7S,y:lmg}B<赸+zz50\ZoѴrWydba+)AǰGD!VyRyC˺?l:wK%|sY\8c0-ر3EOL#lS"=Vڠ^Gi`\{k^js]#w5RP }O 02]U"]#E]b"d5Yթi䅥-]+@ypLj/_Da^B>'&+H@hpUͦz=.q":/C>!48)T~Gt8l֢rFi7K,Nx~<3cɬ83ui$-,YN}3W&BEZ5 qQ`?kc&49`ٰ4Cߍ6|H+䦷?a9=fF~.bsp2b%0ũ軮^];h0M_X an_Rfr ]{@]T˽j}aANcN7@m]v-LԬ~ZB:f&GنE$b7Ill`qˇ UEACZ&T} `\]Q 69_%hgu,Zpz5ﲪ;\aRdJL7JfE!z5L mcq ҸM΂Z^:"/لeWNktUf5fuOz u݃~[Fz|_kCr!|Ԟ\R9whjW^iGL6OW.&, 4qXк6 @^2my35~huԓb]iONK:'v#%JvQ,9tmot#nے#QU Pe}D\`D=eb^B0;Bh`PQlrVvKؔݭt;B?Q\\d|)L NQ^6 3xCa ×Hoxr-t@]FͲD'i7FܸLS摮k,2Ὲ -OJ^?V8xAy|:!:Qy"j 0~`oM cřcm}L$VVwVwX[˟{G@f$;%U&$BEs1z!!+?CK> VQE2* YU͜J7@ \B{EF V{w.(0E!ٙ G*<j,Gu,W-dZ1ѱe68AV֍[ '#-X2 N}{6AwB&P>K (Z;J>< b[Hc%s#Vj0|p o8D*&I@OB/XY\Bt% 6R2TQyw^vB43_ )D7c즋sR12C~u\3&8;4W#Z߂ESt dv>uT6ؘAAN؃L|D$hL¬SLˀic!U2ɞ.%:0x'~! >W)_ ;E>= oeYq@Y[FLyioA! UGÐ4 And considering something that can only balance of power, ranging exhausted to the end before arriving at a truce, that is a situation of temporary balance. Only then the historic speech can be realized, because the real engine of history is class struggle.
From every other point of view, the speech becomes historic consolatory, that is a speech that justifies the sacrifice of this in the name of a unspecified reward put out an uncertain future, which is the ideology secularization and the realization in this world of Christian redemption.
But reformism today is not even over this speech, putting themselves explicitly as an organic part of the capital, as an institution engaged in the sale of the workforce at its market price. And nothing else. That is, no longer consistently promised that the capital obviously can not keep.

2. a different cultural perspective

"... Whether the idea, thought to produce the reality or the reality in allow the emergence of a particular thought. "

The superstructure, including the thought, is determined by the structure, ie relations of production. So the thinking is dominant on relationships production as relations of domination, is the thought of the class that dominates in these relations, the bourgeoisie. But these reports are contradictory, and perpetually in crisis and this measure may express a thought that refutes them and denies them as relations of domination. Thus, the materiality of the relations of production may deny itself and produce the class struggle, at a thought that expresses this denial.
But what these reports contradict, that their very existence calls into crisis themselves? Here lies the fundamental problem of the theory, and only fix it is this. Have been described various contradictions, economic and sovrastrutturali that have produced many theories of the crisis. But all can be brought to the same fundamental contradiction, between social production and private consumption.

3. the division of labor between intellectual work and material.

The division of labor is by far the largest of the productive forces, that of social work. But the capital pays individual workers, not the worker collective (even if there are formal, collective, because there is no minimum income guaranteed as a right), which appropriates free of his power production. That is, does not recognize the social work, creating artificial hierarchy between workers, so that they too do not recognize as collective and as such we put in front of the capital. In the world of globalization, namely the division of Planetary work, it is absurd to establish a hierarchy at work, since even those who do not is directly productive and more especially they contribute to productivity work, even the same consumer. But the recognition of work as social work is beyond the capital.